http://www.openmoose.net/blog/?page=renatus

public version is out

b cem pin cracking
05+ cem config editing ( need pin from other forms )

easy ECM cloning, ive done a few on 04R's and an 06R
easy flash and logging
give feedback to rlinewiz

Either I'm being dyslexic or my ldrxn is kfldrx

Mines 50qhhj, definitely kfldrx.
Previously tuned by an unknown, I don't have an original file.
Some logged data showed egt passing 930° near the end of a 3rd gear pull.
Enriched kflbts and just touching 900 now.

My next concern is whoever tuned it made changes to fkkvs and I'm trying to understand why
The output just looks wrong, but I'll learn before doing anything here, but from what i have learned should be stock if injectors are stock, which they are.

My timing advance seemed a bit aggressive, averaging 1-3° knock retard on transition to wot at 2500-3000rpm.
Finding mixed information here about this being acceptable or not, personally it makes more sense to me to not push the timing into the knock limits only to have the timing pulled anyway, I'm pretty sure this is why I needed to rebuild the engine when rescued the car.

Kfmirl and iop literally broke my brain trying to grasp.
I understand what it's doing, and why it is, but calibrating the tables, and knowing how much you can push is another thing entirely, fully forged should helps here, I'm certain.
 It does seem to be calibrated fairly well already, though I feel these maps and kfldrx are giving me too much torque up top, and too little mid range.

Seems I have a loooong ways to go before I start cramming a bigger turbo in.

I'm being dyslexic again, fkkvs is a fuel correction table, airbox and maf is stock, but all pipes from intake to manifold including intercooler have been changed, I'm assuming they modified fkkvs to account for this?

trying to research maf calibration, i have mlhfm, but can't find mlofs
in anycase i'll post the bin I'm working with, this bin was my original but modified, before any changes i made

I wouldn't be able to say for sure about what you might need to do to fix your issue, it doesn't sound like there's a problem with the cem itself, could be eeprom related?

The only thing I could suggest is to try read the eeprom, it's important to have anyway, incase the ecu gets bricked.
Perhaps reseat cem (again i don't think it's the problem) but worth a try.

You can do cem reloads, but I'd start with the eeprom.
Plenty people smarter than me on here, who would definitely know the score with this

That's what I was thinking. I'm leaning toward the IMMO code mismatch but don't know how to fix it. I can activate the fuel injectors in Vida and I get a fuel smell. After doing each one the car tries to start but doesn't have enough fuel. So I know the pump itself works.

Has anyone made sense of mlhfm in euro qhhj sw?
It clearly isn't using the 200 mlofs for bosch sensors that I'm seeing on every other version.

My scale starts at 140 and ends at 318.8.
Interestingly if I subtract 200 off each cell it follows the exact same outputs until it stops about halfway.

140, -60 to 318.8, 118.8.
Other versions I see carry on to 1264.8.

Would this mean if I swapped to rs4 maf, I'd only input the rs4 sensor outputs to where my scale ends?
What accounts for the rest of the scale?

I'm finding qkhj much easier to translate what I'm learning, as it feels I'm going from s4wiki to volvo me7, then to volvo euro me7, which every now and then doesn't follow either

QHHJ is using MLOFS offset.
Factor for HFM conversion table (adc->flow) is 0.1

QHHJ and QKHJ have the same HFM maps - the same values
Btw. Why do you want to adjust KISRM?