technic
Full Member
Karma: +18/-5
 Offline
Posts: 227
|
 |
« Reply #480 on: May 03, 2014, 12:38:53 PM »
|
|
|
You had it for a whole day and haven't tuned it yet?! :O
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fredrik_a
Full Member
Karma: +25/-0
Offline
Posts: 221
|
|
« Reply #481 on: May 03, 2014, 12:51:57 PM »
|
|
|
You had it for a whole day and haven't tuned it yet?! :O
 Not yet, but I have started looking for all the part numbers on the fuel injectors, the air mass meter, fuel pump and so on to get an idea where the first bottle neck is. I just squeezed my 2-channel temperature probe before and after the intercooler and that will probably have to be upgraded as well in due time. Btw, who came up with the brilliant idea of integrating the exhaust manifold with the turbine housing?  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 03, 2014, 12:56:21 PM by fredrik_a »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
technic
Full Member
Karma: +18/-5
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #482 on: May 03, 2014, 02:26:43 PM »
|
|
|
I think your conclusion will be HPFP and IC upgrades to begin with |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fredrik_a
Full Member
Karma: +25/-0
Offline
Posts: 221
|
|
« Reply #483 on: May 03, 2014, 02:41:01 PM »
|
|
|
I think your conclusion will be HPFP and IC upgrades to begin with Seems like it...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prj
|
|
« Reply #484 on: May 03, 2014, 04:04:35 PM »
|
|
|
Disagree, can be tuned to quite good power on stock hardware.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #485 on: May 03, 2014, 10:10:52 PM »
|
|
|
Anyone have a US spec 2004 S60R Auto file?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
technic
Full Member
Karma: +18/-5
Offline
Posts: 227
|
|
« Reply #486 on: May 04, 2014, 02:17:50 AM »
|
|
|
Disagree, can be tuned to quite good power on stock hardware.
It can, it depends on your goals I guess. Boosting 1.7 and over, you will have lean spots around 4k even if you increase fuel pressure on the stock pump. Talking K04 here. Sorry for the OT. Will check for S60R file  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 04, 2014, 02:20:05 AM by technic »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fredrik_a
Full Member
Karma: +25/-0
Offline
Posts: 221
|
|
« Reply #487 on: May 04, 2014, 10:23:08 PM »
|
|
|
It can, it depends on your goals I guess.
I was thinking along the lines of 400 hp or something like that. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
saoron2002
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 14
|
|
« Reply #488 on: May 24, 2014, 02:10:38 PM »
|
|
|
Hi to all,
After reading this thread carefully twice and also S4Wiki, I made a file for my 2004 S60R. It is stock hardware with only upgraded catback.
I have loaded this mod file and there is definitely improvement, although I feel should be smoothed further.
Here is enclosed the .ols project, any advice/clues for improving this stage 1 will be highly appreciated.
Does anyone know the map name / purpose from 1E886 ? I have compared R-file with T5-file and in the R-file is clearly higher, but have no damos for this software version neither for something close.
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
contrast
Full Member
Karma: +20/-3
Offline
Posts: 215
|
|
« Reply #489 on: May 25, 2014, 09:24:35 AM »
|
|
|
First thing I noticed was LDRXN (or whatever it was called) is stock. Fueling is also stock.
I don't understand how does the car feel faster..
Can anybody please explain the torque model on these R's? I mean especially KFMIRL and KFMIOP. How do people go about tuning these maps?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
dream3R
|
|
« Reply #490 on: May 26, 2014, 12:45:03 AM »
|
|
|
Hi to all,
After reading this thread carefully twice and also S4Wiki, I made a file for my 2004 S60R. It is stock hardware with only upgraded catback.
I have loaded this mod file and there is definitely improvement, although I feel should be smoothed further.
Here is enclosed the .ols project, any advice/clues for improving this stage 1 will be highly appreciated.
Does anyone know the map name / purpose from 1E886 ? I have compared R-file with T5-file and in the R-file is clearly higher, but have no damos for this software version neither for something close.
Thanks in advance
1E886: you don't have to concern yourself with, it's to-do with cam angles. I'm not sure what you are doing with the MAF maps, what is your line of thinking there? Your kfzw maps don't look right. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
contrast
Full Member
Karma: +20/-3
Offline
Posts: 215
|
|
« Reply #491 on: May 26, 2014, 12:53:46 AM »
|
|
|
Im not near my computer atm, but if i remember correctly, KFZW maps were offset a bit. Location was correct if I remember correctly. Also those maps are signed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
dream3R
|
|
« Reply #492 on: May 26, 2014, 01:00:32 AM »
|
|
|
Anyone have a US spec 2004 S60R Auto file?
Thanks!
There's one in the ori files section, iirc, krazybiker... edit: ooops, iirc he's MT |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 26, 2014, 01:04:23 AM by dream3R »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
dream3R
|
|
« Reply #493 on: May 26, 2014, 01:05:14 AM »
|
|
|
First thing I noticed was LDRXN (or whatever it was called) is stock. Fueling is also stock.
I don't understand how does the car feel faster..
Can anybody please explain the torque model on these R's? I mean especially KFMIRL and KFMIOP. How do people go about tuning these maps?
boost map is modified, we're you looking at the tuned file? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
dream3R
|
|
« Reply #494 on: May 26, 2014, 01:07:13 AM »
|
|
|
Disagree, can be tuned to quite good power on stock hardware.
Agreed, one I tuned recently on stock hardware, but with it's DP decatted made 355 bhp. IAT's were high though. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
